PENTAGON BACKLASH – Pro-Trump Reporter FIRED!

Daily Report June 05,2025

Gabrielle Cuccia’s dismissal from One America News Network has sparked a fiery debate over media freedom versus national security within the Pentagon.

At a Glance

Gabrielle Cuccia criticized new media access rules at the Pentagon, leading to her dismissal.
Cuccia accused Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s team of being the source of leaks.
“Signalgate” controversy highlights alleged sharing of military details with the media.
Cuccia was dismissed despite her loyalty to the MAGA movement.

Media Access Controversy

Gabrielle Cuccia, a prominent pro-Trump journalist, claims her dismissal from One America News Network was a result of her criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Cuccia argued that Hegseth implemented restrictive media access rules under the guise of national security. Through her Substack, she lambasted these rules, stating they were not about security, but about silencing the press.

Cuccia’s outspoken nature and willingness to challenge authority drew attention. Her criticism touched on the lack of press conferences held by Hegseth and linked these limitations to the “Signalgate” incident. This incident involved Hegseth allegedly sharing classified military information with a journalist from the Atlantic.

Watch coverage here.

/div>

Claims Against Hegseth’s Administration

Cuccia targeted Hegseth’s portrayal of journalists as major security risks, arguing that the real leaks came from inside his administration. She emphasized that journalists were not the threat, but rather Hegseth’s team and senior officials. Cuccia made it clear that conflating legitimate issues with the “Russia Hoax” narrative only demeans actual journalistic endeavors.

“The Pentagon wants to paint a picture that journalists are freely roaming classified spaces, sneaking into [sensitive compartmented information facilities], and leaking top-secret information. And that is simply not true.” – Gabrielle Cuccia.

Even with a robust MAGA backing, Cuccia’s position couldn’t withstand the backlash from her comments. She found herself returning her Pentagon credentials, effectively ending her high-profile coverage within the institution. The reality that a conservative outlet would dismiss one of their own over such criticism speaks to the broader complexities in the interplay of media freedom and national security interests.

Implications for Media and Government Relations

Cuccia’s dismissal raises important questions about the boundaries of media freedom in the face of government policies purportedly aimed at maintaining national security. Her career, marked by prior high-profile tenures such as a White House position during the Trump administration, underscores the gravity of the clash between press rights and government control.

The implications of Cuccia’s firing are profound, especially given the increasing grip of government overreach. Should security allow for the muzzling of journalists committed to truth-telling? Does transparency seriously threaten national security, or is it a scapegoat for inconvenient truths? In this charged atmosphere, the conversation surrounding media freedom versus national security is more pertinent than ever.