HARRY LOSES AGAIN – Royals Block Protection!

Daily Report May 05,2025

Prince Harry reveals the Royal Household’s extensive control over his security decisions as his battle for UK police protection suffers another devastating defeat in court.

At a Glance

Prince Harry lost his High Court appeal to reinstate taxpayer-funded police protection in the UK
He claims to have uncovered “shocking truths” about the Royal Household’s influence over security decisions
Harry directly implicated King Charles, stating the issue “could be resolved through him”
The Duke revealed security concerns date back to 2017, beginning when Meghan joined the royal family
Multiple officials involved in downgrading his security have quietly retired since making these decisions

Court Decision Deals Major Blow to Harry’s Security Claims

The High Court dismissed Prince Harry’s challenge against the Home Office regarding decisions made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC). Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, upheld the original ruling that downgraded Harry’s security status after he stepped back from royal duties in 2020. The court determined this security reduction was a predictable consequence of Harry and Meghan’s departure from royal responsibilities, effectively ending automatic police protection during their UK visits.

Watch coverage here.

This decision marks another setback in Harry’s ongoing legal battle to secure what he considers appropriate protection for his family when visiting Britain. The ruling confirms Harry will not automatically receive taxpayer-funded police protection when in the UK, requiring him to rely on private security arrangements that he maintains are insufficient against the serious threats his family faces.

/div>

Royal Household’s Controversial Role in Security Decisions

In a blistering statement following the court’s decision, Prince Harry accused RAVEC of failing to follow mandated processes specifically in his case. He revealed what he described as “shocking truths” about the committee’s operations, claiming the Royal Household maintains significant influence over security decisions that directly affect him and his family. This arrangement, according to Harry, creates a fundamental conflict of interest in the security assessment process.

“This legal action has been a last resort, but one that has uncovered shocking truths, starting with the fact that the Royal Household are key decision-makers on RAVEC and my sole representation for matters regarding my safety.” – Prince Harry.

Harry also stated he discovered the names of individuals involved in the security decision-making process, noting that many have since retired after their involvement. This revelation raises questions about accountability within the system and suggests a pattern of officials distancing themselves from controversial decisions concerning the Duke’s protection arrangements.

King Charles Implicated in Security Dispute

Perhaps most notably, Harry directly implicated his father, King Charles III, in the ongoing security dispute. He suggested the monarch has both the authority and capability to resolve the situation but has chosen not to intervene. This accusation further strains the already tense relationship between father and son, highlighting the deeply personal nature of this legal battle that extends beyond mere security protocols into family dynamics.

“There is a lot of control and ability in my father’s hands. Ultimately this whole thing could be resolved through him.” – Prince Harry.

Buckingham Palace responded tersely, noting that Harry’s security issues have been “thoroughly examined by the courts with consistent conclusions.” This statement suggests the royal institution considers the matter settled despite Harry’s continued assertions of unfair treatment and process violations. The response underscores the growing divide between Harry and the institution he once represented.

Long-Standing Security Concerns and Future Steps

According to Harry, security issues actually predate his departure from royal duties, beginning in 2017 when Meghan Markle initially joined the royal family. He claims she was denied appropriate protection from the outset, establishing a pattern that continues to this day. Harry has drawn parallels to the treatment of his mother, Princess Diana, suggesting the same institutions that targeted her are now inciting hatred against his family.

“The court’s ruling confirms that the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, known as RAVEC and comprised of senior officials from the Royal Household, Home Office and Metropolitan Police, has failed to follow its own mandated processes for me, which are applied to all other high-risk and high-profile individuals.” – Prince Harry.

Despite this legal setback, Harry remains determined to pursue every avenue available. He plans to write to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper requesting a review of the RAVEC process. The Duke expressed his love for Britain and desire for his children to know their homeland, but maintains that current security provisions make regular visits untenable due to the threats his family faces from extremist groups and individuals.