FEDERAL FORCE Deployed – Los Angeles ERUPTS!

Daily Report June 10,2025

Political tensions are once again steaming in Los Angeles as the pro-migration protests shake the city’s streets, prompting President Trump to label it an “invasion” to justify a swift federal response.

At a Glance

President Trump’s battle with California over immigration heats up.
National Guard deployed to Los Angeles without state request.
Federal intervention criticized for potentially inflaming tensions.
Alien Enemies Act of 1798 re-emerges in political discourse.

Tension in Los Angeles: A New “Invasion”

The streets of Los Angeles have erupted into chaos following immigration raids, with President Trump immediately branding the situation as an “invasion.” This label comes amidst the federal deployment of the National Guard to subdue the protests without any request from state officials. This calculated maneuver bypasses the authority of California’s own governor, Gavin Newsom, as the president asserts federal dominance over state decisions.

Watch coverage here.

Journalistic critiques highlight that Trump’s actions might be a political gambit designed to inflame tensions and fortify his hardline immigration stance. Meanwhile, no incidents of disrespect towards police or military personnel have been confirmed, yet the president underscores his tough stance as if preparing for a battlefield.

/div>

The Alien Enemies Act: Historical Legislations in Contemporary Scrutiny

In defense of extended federal actions, the discussion veers towards the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. This archaic legislation allows the executive power to swiftly deport individuals from hostile nations in times of war or invasion. As Trump’s deputies label the Los Angeles riots as an insurrection and a national security risk, they lean on this act to justify their proposed measures.

“One of the main technical issues in the immigration judicial battles is whether Biden’s border crisis counted as an ‘invasion,’” – Vice President JD Vance.

The stakes are high, as adversaries criticize the use of such drastic terms to manipulate public perception. Unsurprisingly, this approach fosters a dangerous political narrative where temporary disturbances are amplified into existential threats.

Criticism and Use of Federal Power

The federal deployment has been widely criticized, especially considering that local officials did not request assistance. Critics argue that such a heavy-handed approach blurs the lines of presidential authority, potentially exacerbating rather than alleviating the situation. While televised coverage of the riots has unveiled visible support for the cause among local Latino politicians, some assert that the portrayal as a national security threat is heavily exaggerated.

“In recent days, violent mobs have attacked ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations in Los Angeles, California. … These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. … These criminals will be arrested and swiftly brought to justice” – Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt.

Debates rage on, with Republicans characterizing the unrest as a significant insurrection while Democrats dismiss the upheaval and critique Trump’s intervention as an opportunistic political stratagem. As these events unfold, the country stands divided over the gravity of the protests and the appropriate governmental response.