DEPORTED to WRONG Country – Judge ORDERS Return!

Daily Report June 05,2025

How could a Guatemalan man, fearing for his life, be wrongfully deported to Mexico in blatant violation of due process?

At a Glance

O.C.G., a Guatemalan man, wrongfully deported to Mexico, has returned to the U.S. by court order.
Judge Murphy ruled the deportation lacked due process, highlighting legal concerns.
This instance marks the first case since January 20 where DHS adhered to a court’s repatriation order.
The government’s failure to follow legal procedures in this case raises significant concerns.

A Deplorable Deportation

A Guatemalan man, identified by the initials O.C.G., has found himself caught in an outrageous legal turmoil after being forcibly deported to a country he has no ties with—Mexico. Despite O.C.G.’s clear warnings about the threats he faced, such as sexual violence, federal officials proceeded with the deportation in violation of lawful procedures. This reckless disregard for human rights shines a spotlight on the troubling practices of federal immigration authorities.

Watch coverage here.

O.C.G. was deported by the Trump administration, yet U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy found this action to “lack any semblance of due process.” This load of bricks drops squarely on government practices that defy our Constitution. After returning to the U.S. under Judge Murphy’s order, O.C.G. is now in the precarious position of facing detention again by the Department of Homeland Security. Are we living in a world where justice is sold to the highest bidder?

/div>

Judiciary Steps In

It’s astonishing—truly—that the Department of Homeland Security has finally adhered to a judicial command since January 20 to return an individual unlawfully deported. Trina Realmuto, supporting this rare move, said, “As far as we know, it is the first time since January 20 that (Department of Homeland Security) has facilitated return following a district court order.” What does that say about how often the law is ignored, especially under such extreme measures of governance?

O.C.G. was originally protected from deportation back to Guatemala due to the dangers posed, including instances of rape and extortion in Mexico. Yet, despite being granted a withholding of removal, he was mistakenly sent to Mexico. The cherry on top? Authorities assured him he would not be sent there—a promise as meaningful as a campaign pledge. Where is the accountability in a system that should be stopping at nothing to safeguard human dignity?

Ongoing Legal and Ethical Concerns

O.C.G., fearing the prospect of further wrongful detention even upon his return, shed light on the hypercritical nature of the system charged with his protection. This isn’t a unique issue; cases like this one, including the wrongful deportation of a Venezuelan migrant and Kilmar Abrego Garcia, reveal the alarming trend of undermining judicial orders. Judge Murphy criticized these alarming practices and subsequently faced attacks from the White House, which pinned him as a “far-left activist.”

O.C.G. has finally reentered the United States and connected with his legal team, gaining temporary respite. However, the imminent threat of being taken back into federal custody looms. Will there be any genuine steps taken to rectify the underlying issues in immigration processes? Once again, this frightening topic demands the spotlight, casting an ominous shadow over governmental accountability in adhering to the law.